Conor Lamb's office sits across from PPG Paints Arena in downtown Pittsburgh, a world away from the rural stretches of Washington County where he pulled off one of the most improbable Democratic

How Trump's vision echoes America's traditional approach.

Josh Shapiro strikes back at Kamala Harris' memoir with explosive claims about allegedly antisemitic VP vetting questions, escalating their political feud.

And more from this week...

Minnesota's secretary of state accused Bondi of making an unlawful request a part of an apparent ransom to pay for our state's peace and security.

Can the forces resisting federal law enforcement in Minneapolis nationalize the struggle?

Chris Madel, a defense lawyer, called the operation “simply a disaster.” His decision comes two days after a second fatal shooting by federal agents in Minneapolis.

Amy Klobuchar planned to officially launch her gubernatorial campaign on Monday, but has delayed it in the wake of the fatal shooting of a protester by immigration agents in Minneapolis over the weekend, according to two people familiar with the Minnesota Democrat’s plans.

The senator instead spent Monday morning speaking to White House officials, urging deescalation and pushing to get the administration to end its immigration crackdown in her state, according to a third person, who is close to the senator and, like the others, was granted anonymity to describe private conversations.

Her decision to wait on her campaign launch comes amid weeks of turmoil in Minnesota that further escalated over the weekend when Border Patrol agents on Saturday fatally shot Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care unit nurse and American citizen.

Over the last two days, Klobuchar has been meeting with city and state leaders, strategizing with Senate colleagues over Department of Homeland Security funding and calling Trump administration officials, according to the third person, who said Klobuchar’s “focus is on de-escalating the situation and getting ICE out of Minnesota. There's not time for politics today.”

Klobuchar’s nascent gubernatorial campaign has run headlong into a national crisis, another twist for a campaign that started under unusual circumstances. Earlier this month, Democratic Gov. Tim Walz unexpectedly dropped his reelection bid for a third term, as a swirling fraud scandal threatened to engulf his campaign, and met with Klobuchar about running for the office herself. Since then, two American citizens have been killed by federal immigration agents, thrusting Klobuchar into the center of a battle on an issue for which she’s traditionally cut a moderate profile.

“Regardless of what [campaign] Klobuchar is considering, this is what I’d expect from her, she’s been the leader in this state,” said Democratic Minnesota state Sen. Grant Hauschild. “We’re facing unprecedented circumstances of federal overreach and harm to our communities, and she’s stepped up, being present on the ground and fighting in Congress.”

The two people who described her changed launch plans said they expect the senator to formally launch before next Tuesday, when the state’s party precinct caucus kicks off. Klobuchar already filed paperwork with the state’s campaign finance board last week, allowing her to begin raising funds ahead of an expected bid.

Pretti’s killing also shook up the GOP side of the Minnesota governors’ race. Chris Madel, an attorney who launched his campaign as a Republican late last year, announced on Monday he would be dropping out, calling the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement tactics “wrong” and “an unmitigated disaster.”

“I cannot support the national Republican-stated retribution on the citizens of our state, nor can I count myself a member of a party that would do so,” he said in a video posted to social media.

Klobuchar is not expected to face a serious Democratic opponent when she enters the gubernatorial race, giving her some breathing room on both her announcement timeline and on her stance on immigration. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, a well-known progressive who was considered a potential candidate, confirmed he would not be running for the job last week.

“What you hear from Klobuchar is, ‘ICE needs to get out of here,’ and I don’t think she needs to say more than that [because] without a primary challenger, I don’t think she’ll have to change her position on it,” said a Minnesota Democratic strategist, granted anonymity to discuss the issue candidly. “She’s smart, she’s careful and she’s cautious, and she knows how to win suburban and independent voters.”

Klobuchar has always cut a moderate profile. She rose up in Hennepin County as its prosecutor before running for Senate. During her presidential campaign in 2020, Klobuchar rejected calls for “abolishing ICE,” drawing fire from immigration rights advocates groups in that race, and instead called for reforms of the agency.

When asked during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday whether she supported abolishing ICE, Klobuchar said “we’re always going to have some immigration enforcement in this country, and border control.” But she called for the ICE operation to leave the state because “this agency has been functioning is completely against every tenet of law enforcement.”

Klobuchar ticked through several reforms she supports: “New leadership. Stopping these surges across the country, not just in my state. Training them like they were supposed to be trained. ... Mandatory body cameras. Stopping ramming into people's houses without a judicial warrant.”

Those specifics could become part of Senate Democrats’ demands to give enough votes to pass a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security and other parts of the government.

Other Democrats have called for more aggressive policies, including abolishing ICE altogether. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn) posted on X that “voting NO on the DHS funding bill is the bare minimum,” adding that ICE is “beyond reform” and to “abolish it.”

Klobuchar’s approach is once again drawing criticism from some immigrant-rights advocates. “I do not believe that's far enough,” said George Escobar, executive director of CASA, an immigration advocacy organization. “Unless we deal with the cancer that is causing this, which is ICE itself, and unless we have a comprehensive reform of that agency, which to us, means abolishing it, then honestly, this cycle is just going to repeat over and over again.”One Democratic consultant who has worked on Minnesota races warned that Klobuchar’s deliberative approach could hurt her. “She’s incredibly cautious, and this is not a cautious moment,” they said. “So far, she has not put her foot in it by being too moderate, but she’s also not been under a huge spotlight — and that will change with the gubernatorial run.”

Nonetheless, Klobuchar’s messaging earned her praise from even some progressives. "I think she’s spot on,” said Mark Longabaugh, a former adviser to Sen Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). “If you're going to step up and say that this organization needs to be restructured, or shut down and restructured, you also have to tie that to, ‘Listen, there is a legitimate law enforcement need here, both for customs and for border control.’”

Most Minnesota Democrats don’t think Klobuchar will suddenly center anti-ICE messaging in her gubernatorial campaign. Interviews with a half dozen operatives and elected officials found they still expected the campaign to largely revolve around the economy. “Affordability is still going to be central to her work, along with protecting her state,” said the person close to Klobuchar. “She will always stand up for Minnesota on both.”

“Who knows if, in 10 months, it will specifically be a part of the narrative or messaging,” said a Minnesota Democratic donor adviser. “But this isn’t going to go away any time soon … because we’re traumatized here.”

The Department of Homeland Security hasn’t provided evidence for some statements administration officials made within hours of the Jan. 24 fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by federal immigration officers in Minneapolis, and some of those statements appear to be contradicted by bystander video shared publicly so far.

Noem speaks during the Jan. 24 DHS press conference. Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images.

Multiple analyses of videos of the killing raise questions about the administration’s account that Pretti “approached” officers with a handgun, “violently resisted” an attempt to “disarm” him, and “wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.”

We’d caution that it’s early in the investigation and that more information should be revealed, particularly about what happened before what’s shown in available bystander videos. DHS told NBC News that there is body-camera video available from multiple federal agents, but those videos have not been publicly released.

Pretti, a 37-year-old man who worked as an intensive care unit nurse, had a handgun when he was wrestled to the ground by immigration officers. But it’s unclear when exactly officers were aware of the weapon and whether Pretti had shown the gun or threatened officers with it, as administration comments have suggested.

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara told CBS News that Pretti “did have a permit for the handgun to carry it.” In Minnesota, a permit is required to carry a gun in public, and the gun doesn’t need to be concealed.

Pretti was shot and killed by Border Patrol officers shortly after 9 a.m. Central time. Media reports soon said that according to DHS, Pretti had a gun. At 11:31 a.m. Central time, DHS posted a statement on X. “At 9:05 AM CT, as DHS law enforcement officers were conducting a targeted operation in Minneapolis against an illegal alien wanted for violent assault, an individual approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun, seen here,” DHS said, providing a picture of the handgun on what appears to be the seat of a car. “The officers attempted to disarm the suspect but the armed suspect violently resisted. More details on the armed struggle are forthcoming. Fearing for his life and the lives and safety of fellow officers, an agent fired defensive shots. … The suspect also had 2 magazines and no ID—this looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.”

In separate press conferences the same day, Gregory Bovino, the Border Patrol commander in charge of the immigration operation in Minneapolis, and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem made similar statements, using much of the DHS language, including the speculation that Pretti wanted to “kill” (Noem’s wording) or “massacre” (Bovino’s) law enforcement officers.

“This looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement,” Bovino said.

Noem said that Pretti had “attacked those officers, had a weapon on him, and multiple, dozens of rounds of ammunition, wishing to inflict harm on these officers coming, brandishing like that, and impeding their work that they were doing.”

Bovino didn’t answer questions from reporters about when agents knew about Pretti’s firearm and whether he ever brandished it at agents. “This is under investigation. Those facts will come to light,” he said.

On Truth Social, President Donald Trump posted the DHS picture of the firearm and raised questions about intent, calling Pretti a “gunman.” Trump said: “This is the gunman’s gun, loaded (with two additional full magazines!), and ready to go – What is that all about?”

On X, Stephen Miller, the White House’s homeland security adviser and a deputy chief of staff, went further than the DHS or Trump statements, writing that an “assassin tried to murder federal agents.”

Multiple analyses of the videos of the incident available so far do not show Pretti holding the gun or threatening law enforcement officials with it. Again, more information, particularly about Pretti’s earlier interactions with law enforcement, may later be revealed.

O’Hara told CBS News on Jan. 25, “I cannot speculate, but I do not have any – any evidence that I have seen that suggests that the weapon was brandished.”

John Cohen, a former acting DHS undersecretary for intelligence, a police trainer and an ABC News contributor, told the network, “What the videos depict is that this guy did not walk up to anybody from CBP in a threatening manner.” Cohen said that “there’s nothing in the video evidence that we’ve seen thus far” to support DHS’ statement that he intended to shoot law enforcement officers.”

In the videos, Pretti is seen holding his phone, appearing to record video of the federal officers in the street, moments before an altercation where agents push another apparent demonstrator to the ground and then use pepper spray on Pretti. Several agents then force Pretti to the ground as he appears to resist. An agent removes a gun from Pretti’s waistband, and Pretti is shot multiple times.

The Minnesota Star Tribune reviewed more than six videos as well as accounts from eyewitnesses. “The footage does not show him [Pretti] pointing a firearm, attempting to fire a weapon, or advancing toward agents with a gun raised. He is instead captured holding a cellphone, appearing to record,” the newspaper wrote.

“Federal officials have released no evidence supporting claims about Pretti’s intent,” the Star Tribune also said. “Under Minnesota law, carrying a handgun in public is legal with a permit, and law enforcement sources said Pretti was a lawful gun owner.”

The New York Times wrote in its analysis of videos, “About eight seconds after he is pinned, agents yell that he has a gun, indicating that they may not have known he was armed until he was on the ground.” One agent “pulls a gun from among the group that appears to match the profile of a firearm DHS said belonged to Mr. Pretti. The agents appear to have him under their control, with his arms pinned near his head. As the gun emerges from the melee, another agent aims his own firearm at Mr. Pretti’s back and appears to fire one shot at close range.”

In its breakdown of available videos, the Washington Post wrote that “[l]ess than a second” after an agent “emerged from the scrum” with Pretti’s firearm, “the first of what appear to be 10 shots was fired. It is not clear from the video whether the other agents realized Pretti — who local authorities believe had a permit to carry the weapon — had been disarmed.”

Hearst Television’s National Investigative Unit also reviewed multiple video angles of the shooting. One angle shows an officer crouching at Pretti’s side, Hearst said, and “searching Pretti’s clothing and is heard saying, ‘Where’s the gun?’ Another officer, a distance away, responds, ‘I’ve got the gun.'”

“At no time in any of the three videos reviewed is Pretti seen brandishing a gun,” Hearst said.

CNN said that “taken together,” cell phone footage from multiple angles, appears “at odds with the Department of Homeland Security’s initial claims about the lead up to officers firing on Alex Pretti.”

One of the videos it analyzed “seems to show officers approaching Pretti instead of the other way around. We’ll see later that Pretti does appear to have had a gun in his waistband, but this video shows he didn’t have a gun in his hand, only a phone,” CNN said.

On Jan. 25, a day after the shooting, CNN’s Dana Bash repeatedly pressed Bovino about the evidence behind DHS’ statements. She asked whether Pretti was “brandishing” the gun, as Noem had said. “Was he brandishing it? Was he a threat because he had a gun in his hand that put law enforcement in danger?” Bash asked.

Bovino responded: “Dana, we heard the law enforcement officer say, ‘Gun, gun, gun.’ So, at some point, they knew there was a gun. So, again, that is going to be part of that investigation as to what was happening on the ground there between those victims, the Border Patrol agent victims, and the suspect.” He later said that Pretti “brought a semiautomatic weapon to a riot, assaulted federal officers, and at some point they saw that weapon. So I do believe the secretary is 100% spot on in what she said.”

We asked DHS about the agency’s early statements on the shooting, including what Noem meant when she said Pretti was “brandishing” a weapon. We haven’t received a response.

CNN said when it asked DHS about an agent removing Pretti’s gun before the shooting, it repeated the statement that “officers attempted to disarm the suspect but the armed suspect violently resisted.”

When asked on Jan. 25 by a Wall Street Journal reporter whether the shooting by federal agents was justified, Trump didn’t defend the shooting as DHS had. “We’re looking, we’re reviewing everything and will come out with a determination,” he said.

“I don’t like any shooting. I don’t like it,” Trump said, according to the Journal. “But I don’t like it when somebody goes into a protest and he’s got a very powerful, fully loaded gun with two magazines loaded up with bullets also. That doesn’t play good either.”

D’Angelo Gore contributed to this story.

Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through our “Donate” page. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, P.O. Box 58100, Philadelphia, PA 19102. 

The post Video Analyses at Odds with DHS Statements on Minneapolis Shooting appeared first on FactCheck.org.

The administration announced a $1.6 billion deal with USA Rare Earth. The firm also does business with Cantor Fitzgerald, which is run by the sons of President Trump’s commerce secretary.

Protests that erupted late last year shook elements of the Iranian government, according to the reports.

Republicans wrestle with Trump administration positions that seem to contradict their beliefs on gun rights, states’ rights and limited use of federal power.

The Federal Aviation Administration says it has reduced traffic in and out of the airport and designed safer routes. Crash victims’ families want more.

The announcement of a reorganization comes nearly a year after a midair collision killed 67 people and prompted a public outcry for enhancing the security of aviation travel.

Our reporter who spent time in the city weighed in on how the chaos is changing the political landscape.

It is far rarer and more difficult for state authorities to try to investigate federal law enforcement officials than the other way around.